Economic
Situation
For some time, common sense has suggested that
the traditional U.S. network airlines will not
survive in their present form. All have cut
costs, but none has fundamentally changed. A
severe economic recession can be expected to
force real change, mergers or elimination. The
best run foreign network carriers don’t seem to
be in such a delicate situation. Further
liberalization recently engendered by the US-EU
agreement opens the door to change on the North
Atlantic; a change that likely will slowly
undermine a key international sector which
currently is keeping the major network carriers
alive.
Air Service
·
COPA, the Panamanian-based
carrier that provides one-stop service to the
northern and western parts of South America. A COPA marketing team is visiting Washington
on April 16th and the Task Force is
working with the Airports Authority to introduce
them to businesses that generate travel to their
portions of South America. COPA has a code
share alliance with Continental Airlines, and
thus is able to carry passengers working under
contract to the United States government. (Much
of the Washington market is barred to foreign
carriers by “buy America” provisions.)
·
Avianca plans to inaugurate
service between Dulles and Bogotá, which will
provide a nonstop service to compete with COPA’s
service via their Panama City hub.
International
Aviation Policy
In preparation for the start of Stage 2 US-EU
negotiations in May, the USDOT asked for
comments on specific issues they have identified
for consideration during these talks, including
further liberalization of traffic rights,
foreign investment opportunities, and the effect
of environmental measures and infrastructure
constraints on the exercise of traffic rights.
DOT has also asked for any further suggestions
to be added to the objectives. The Secretariat
of USA-BIAS prepared and circulated a draft
letter for membership review, supporting
inclusion of liberalized airline ownership and
control provisions in Phase 2.
FAA Annual
Forecasting Conference
The Task Force attended the FAA’s Forecasting
Conference on March 10th and 11th.
The FAA forecasts a flat year in 2008, followed
by modest but steady growth through 2025 for
domestic air travel and more vigorous growth for
international air travel. Points made by
conference speakers included:
-
The nation's air transportation system handled
765 million
passengers
in 2007 and is expected to handle one
billion passengers in 2016. Flight operations
are projected to nearly double by 2025, compared
to 2007, again placing emphasis on the critical
need for Next Generation air traffic control and
expanded airport capacity.

-
A Wall Street
credit risk rating of major U.S. airlines
gave American Airlines a 65% chance of
entering Chapter 11 within five years,
Southwest a 10% chance, jetBlue and the
other majors a 50% to 55% chance. The U.S.
airline fleet is aging and the majors will
need to improve their credit standing if
they are to finance replacement fleets at
reasonable cost.
-
No airline in
the United States is able to earn profits
with fuel at $100 a barrel, however most
would be profitable at $75 a barrel. Both
Wall Street and federal OMB forecasts
projected that fuel would drop back to $75 a
barrel after the current hump above $100 a
barrel.
-
The airline
industry spent approximately $40 billion on
fuel in 2007. Approximately $9 billion of
the fuel cost was wasted on delays caused by
air traffic control and airport constraints.
-
Environmental concerns are on the rise for
aviation with water quality, emissions, aircraft
noise, greenhouse gases and waste disposal being
the agenda items. Waste disposal includes waste
from aircraft manufacture and the recycling of
old airframes, including their electronic
components. The disposal of carbon composite
airframe components may become the “vulcanized
rubber” problem of the future.
-
Within Europe, and particularly in the UK, air
transportation has been demonized for its (very
slight) impact on global warming. The United
States should be wary of Europe’s sound bite
politics being imported to seek caps on aviation
growth in the United States. A major difference
between Europe and the United States: In Europe,
aviation fuel consumption has increased about
30%
since the year 2000. In the U.S., the
growth has been achieved with a 4% increase in
fuel consumption.
-
Airport congestion: 270 major airports around
the world have inadequate capacity to meet
demand. Only three are in the United States.
Conference papers are available at
http://www.faa.gov/news/conferences_events/aviation_forecast_2008/agenda_presentation/
Air Traffic
Control
At their March meeting, the ATC User Group
learned that a new departure sequencing tool
should come into operation in April to enable
the region’s three airports to handle departures
more productively during inclement weather.
Congestion
Management
The Task Force’s response to the USDOT’s request
for comment on its proposed congestion pricing
scheme was refined by member comment and filed
with the DOT.
Click here to see the Task Force submission.
Tarmac Delay
Task Force (TDTF)
The WATF is participating in the working group
to examine the causes of tarmac delays. The
group is chaired by Kevin Hudson, the CEO of
Frontier Airlines, and by Captain Larry Newman
with the Airline Pilots Association. The main
causes are obvious, and the objective is to
define the underlying causes.
Ground Access
Dulles Loop
The Dulles South Business Alliance - DSBA
(mainly Route 50) and the Route 606 group were
briefed March 13th and their opinions
sought. The Task Force’s objective is to
present the implementation plan to the two
counties and VDOT with strong support from
stakeholders. Both meetings were successful and
led to subsequent meetings with landowners who
had been unable to attend. The group’s
President provided a letter of support.
The contractor, Michael Baker, now is developing
the short term implementation plan based on
their earlier proposals, which should be ready
for presentation to the implementation group in
April.
Dulles Rail
·
The state is working with Secretary Peters’
office and it appears that real progress is
being made. Work to move utilities and complete
final design continues.
·
Congressmen Wolf, Moran and Davis have asked
House Appropriations to include $100 million for
the project in FY2009.
·
All the future plans for Tysons Corner are
contingent upon the rail project.
Without rail,
current zoning would allow an additional 25
million sq. ft. to be built at Tysons.
With rail,
Fairfax County is considering two proposals for
added density. The first would allow an
additional 97 million sq. ft. to be built
focused around the four proposed rail stops.
The second proposal would add 127 million sq.
ft. and include a Tysons circulator system to
allow a more even distribution of higher
density. The circulator system would also link
the portions of Tysons inside the Beltway to the
rest of Tysons.
·
While dense mixed use development is required to
make the rail cost effective long term, Reston’s
covenants prohibit residential use adjacent to
the Dulles Corridor. A 90% vote of
landowners is required to change the covenants,
and a recent effort to get a change to allow
mixed use stalled at 73%. However, the
covenants can be changed with a 50% vote at
20-year intervals.
NVTA/Local Transportation Funding
·
The Virginia Supreme Court rendered the taxing
authority of the Northern Virginia
Transportation Authority (NVTA)
unconstitutional, gutting the 2007 legislation
(HB3202) that authorized it to levy a potpourri
of local taxes to fund transportation
initiatives.
·
Delegate Albo, an architect of HB3202, has
offered a “repair bill,” which would require the
state to levy approximately half the taxes and
leave local municipalities to levy the other
half. Reportedly, the bill also requires the
money generated to be applied to bonds to fund
stated NOVA projects in an effort to address
concerns that NVTA could divert money from the
intended purpose.
·
The major political inhibitor to a new or
revised funding bill appears to be division over
whether the solution should be statewide or
purely local to Northern Virginia and Hampton
Roads, i.e. it’s said by some to be an urban vs. rural rather than
a Republican vs. Democratic issue. The Governor
and the Senate want a bill that embraces
statewide as well as a local solution, while the
House wants to resolve the local funding problem
first, and then address the statewide issue.
·
A state sales tax on the bulk sale of gasoline
(i.e. a sales tax on gasoline “at the rack,”
which some politicians can describe as a tax on
oil companies) reportedly is finding merit with
many House Republicans. A 0.5% increase in the
sales tax also finds favor, as 25% to 30% of the
revenue comes from outside purchases. An income
tax increase, even if dedicated to
transportation, is considered totally
unacceptable by Legislators.
·
WATF continues to participate in the
Transportation Alliance’s coalition.
Coalition members have been asked to provide
guidance on which taxes they would prefer to see
used.